With advent of mobile streaming services such as 4G based telecommunication technologies and satellite services, radio's place and validity in the world has come under more and more scrutiny. What was once the most relied upon in information transference technology is having the very foundations it has grown be shook and stirred by competition. Should the unassailable giant of mass-communication be toppled for more convenient and modern alternatives or kept steadfast in its reliability?
In this oncoming wake, a somewhat interesting convention has began to sprout out from this idea of change. While not entirely based on ground-based radio broadcasting, satellite-radio has become a relatively recent alternative to well known system and is seeing more and more use as a subscription based service à la Sirius XM Radio. Although significantly more expensive than (what is effectively free sans initial payment) traditional radio, the clarity of sound and significantly larger music choice from most localized stations offers a possibly more enjoyable and more appreciable listening experience.
In addition to the advent of satellite-broadcast based radio services, 4G cellular services through a mobile provider have gained great popularity. As the amount of people carrying a cellphone on their persons increases, the reliance on such a device for information also increases. In order to compensate for this, streaming services such as Spotify, Pandora, and Soundcloud now offer a radio-free alternative to the absence left by a lack of such equipment.
Given an increasing variety of avenues, does ground-based radio transceivers truly have as much clout and importance as they once did or have modern alternatives taken place and stature over the once crowned technology? Does the continued maintenance and regulation of the frequencies used by such technologies house the worth in its maintenance and regulation?

This is extremely interesting as it is not something that’s necessarily thought of. I think we as humans just think about what is most convenient and service like Pandora and Spotify are at the tip of our fingers. The thought of technology that was once so important possibly not having a use saddens me, But I think you are right when is the point when its not profitable to maintain ground-based radio.
ReplyDeleteI found the concept of radio being the main use of informational transfer in the past to be very interesting. I feel like the going further into the implications of this would be something interesting to discuss throughout your blog. My question may sound a little harsh but it would be this: Why should the reader care? What effect does this really have on one’s day to day? Does the end of radio mean anything significant at all? I’d be interested in seeing you get this across to the reader. If you can, I’d find this to be a very cool blog.
ReplyDeleteI found this a very interesting topic because technology such as radio are devices that most people use as an essential part of their lives to communicate. It will be good to consider all the advantages and disadvantages in order to fin out if ground-based radio is worth maintenance. I can notice that new technologies like mobile an other devices are taking place of the ground -based radio. Older people may find it more difficult to adapt a new changes and new techologies
ReplyDelete